Sakyadhita
Newsletter
Sakyadhita is pleased to announce the Fifth International Conference on Buddhist Women to be held in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, from December 29,
1997, to January 4, 1998. The theme of the conference will be "Women
in Buddhism: Unity and Diversity." The venue will be a Vipassana center
about 25 minutes outside of Phnom Penh. There will be a tour to the historical
site of Angkor Wat after the conference, from January 5 to 7.
The Fifth Sakyadhita Conference is being co-ordinated by Hema Goonatilake
in Cambodia, Norma Fain Pratt in Los Angeles, and Karma Lekshe Tsomo in
Honolulu. As at previous Sakyadhita gatherings, the program will include
morning meditations, workshops, discussions, cultural presentations, chanting
from different Buddhist traditions, and friendly chats.
The theme of the Conference, "Women in Buddhism: Unity and Diversity," opens the discussion on a wide range of topics:
Speakers and meditation teachers have been invited from all over the world:
Costs
The conference registration fee is $50. Most delegates
will be accommodated at hotels in Phnom Penh. Rates will be $20, $30, or
$40 per person per day, including hotel room (double occupancy), vegetarian
breakfast and lunch, 2 teas, airport transfers, and bus transportation to
the conference site daily. Single supplement is $5 per day. The cost of
the tour to Angkor Wat will be $180, which includes airfare ($110), entrance
fee, hotel room (double occupancy), vegetarian breakfast and lunch, tea,
and ground transportation. Single supplement is $30.
International travel
Efforts are being made to arrange economical international
flights. For travel information for participants from North America, contact
Carol Brighton, telephone (510) 849-3167 (not 848-3167 as in the
brochure!) or fax (510) 655-4781. For travel information for participants
from Europe, contact Rotraut Wurst (Jampa), Stralsunder Weg 22, 24161 Altenholz,
Germany, telephone +49-431-322303 or fax +49-431-328208
For further information
Contact Norma Pratt on e-mail at npratt@zaicomm.com or Lekshe Tsomo by fax
at (808) 944-7070 (ET) for further information. The mailing address for
conference registration is:
Sakyadhita
International Association of Buddhist Women
Honolulu, HI 96815
400 Hobron Lane #2615
by Hi Kyun Kim
Jebeom Sunim entered the Department of Buddhist Studies of Dongkuk University and graduated with honors. She is now 33 years old and has been active in educating the public about Buddhism since she was 22 years old. She never hesitates to educate others wherever she goes. While preparing to enter graduate school, she worked to create Active Children (Gul Rul She A Line E), a unique Buddhist children's magazine which has been popularizing and revitalizing Buddhism among the youth in Korea. But her main job has been public relations. In six months' time, she managed to get 500 regular subscribers. The magazine's popularity has greatly surprised many people.
The Power of Persistence
When Jebeom Sunim embarked on publishing Active
Children, she discontinued all other work, took a leave of absence from
the Buddhist institute where she was studying, and postponed preparing for
graduate school. Her professors had hoped she would become a professor and
a future job as a professor of Buddhist Studies was guaranteed. She would
then have had the opportunity to open a center for Buddhist education anywhere
she liked, but the task that called her was publishing the magazine Active
Children.
The first edition of this magazine was published at De Won Jeong Temple
in January 1990, but due to difficulties managing the financial aspects
of the enterprise, the magazine has been published by another company, Buljisa,
since January 1992. This still has not solved the magazine's financial problems.
Jebeom Sunim recalls, "I heard that Active Children was having financial
management difficulties. I thought 'If I don't help, who will help with
the work that Buddhists should do? The first step is to advertise the fact
that we have this kind of publication.'" The decision to devote herself
to publishing the magazine was easy, because she strongly believed that
this is the kind of work Buddhist monastics should do. From that day on,
she reduced the amount of time spent on studies and eventually stopped studying
altogether. She began to devote all her energy to public relations work
for the magazine.
Jebeom Sunim began her public relations work for the magazine on the first
day of the second lunar month, March 12, 1991, at Bongeun Temple in Seoul.
Her countenance appeared fresh and radiant as she distributed publicity
materials and recommended that people subscribe to the magazine. Because
there are not many cases of monks and nuns doing this kind of work, except
for commemorations of the Buddha's enlightenment or similar Buddhist gatherings,
she undertook this work in conjunction with members of the Buddhist Women's
Club.
Gradually Jebeom broke through people's stereotypes of monastics, travelling
nationwide to every temple to recommend subscribing to the magazine. She
did not hesitate to speak out and advocate among Buddhist followers. Holding
the magazine high in her hand, she would say: "Do you know how many
children's magazines there are in this country? Among them, how many Buddhist
children's magazines are there? Christian children's magazines have a history
of over 30 years. Buddhist children's magazines are only four years old
and there is only one of them -- there is only this one magazine. Do you
realize with what difficulty this magazine, the only one, is published?
Buddhist followers do not encourage their children to read books, but Buddhist
followers should let their children read this kind of book."
Jebeom strongly criticized Buddhist followers for their neglect of Buddhist
education. Nobody could convince her otherwise when she insisted that Active
Children was badly needed. Her enthusiasm caused some people to immediately
fill out the subscription form of the magazine and quite a few people bought
the magazine. Sometimes she got subscriptions from only three people among
700, but sometimes she got lucky. When the monk Sanghun Sunim gave a speech
at Ulsan Buddhist Education Center, Jebeom was there to publicize the magazine.
From the crowd, a Buddhist follower came to her and anonymously gave a donation
of over $1,000.
Jebeom stays only five or six days a month in her office. She travels widely
and usually stays away for several days at a time. During that time, she
is involved not only in distributing the magazine to temples and organizations
all over the country, but publicizes its objectives as well. "Active
Children is a cultural movement for children. In the future, additional
cultural movements for children need to be started. I am working to discover
and publicize such cultural movements through this magazine."
Now the magazine has a children's drama club and a children's writing club,
initiated with the goal of creating Buddhist culture for children. However,
so far the impact of Buddhist culture for children is still negligible.
The reality is that Western culture is dominant and traditional culture
is disappearing. This reality serves as a stimulus to the people who publish
and distribute the magazine.
21st Century Monastics in Professional Positions
In the past some people voiced criticism of monastics
who worked at jobs that laypeople do, but nowadays many people understand
the need and help monastics who do such work. Among the critics, some monastics
were even more critical than laypeople, castigating monastics who worked
at jobs that laypeople do. The reason was simple. Such work did not meet
people's expectations of how monastics should be or accord with their image
of the Sangha.
What is the Sangha? Jebeom does not hesitate to voice her opinion: "There
are many monastics who study the teachings of Buddhism and travel from temple
to temple." However, Jebeom Sunim strongly feels that too many monastics
have neglected ordinary reality. She believes that the approach of Buddhism
should be changed in the 21st century and that there should be professional
jobs and specializations. She says, "Conditions for Buddhist monastics
are good. Monastics can specialize in temple studies or can have professional
jobs as they like. There are many opportunities, aren't there?"
Every professional job that laypeople do, whether it is publishing, culture,
literature, teaching (elementary, junior high, and high school), is also
possible for monastics. Buddhist society may be more flexible if monastics
work in such fields. Catholic nuns have already made much progress in these
kinds of work since 1965. Of course, they have made many mistakes during
the last 20 years. However, it is time to rethink our priorities. Catholic
monastics already work on an equal basis with laypeople in every level of
society. The Vatican seems to have been farsighted in taking this initiative.
Catholic monastics have been more innovative -- 30 to 50 years ahead of
us Buddhists.
In terms of lifestyle, Buddhist monastics are quite different from Catholic
monastics. Catholic nuns may stay in a convent for ten years before taking
their final vows, studying and training in discipline. The nuns take an
aptitude test to determine objectively which job they are suited for. This
is part of the Catholic training. They become professionals who commute
to the workplace. They work as nurses, teachers, doctors, hospice workers,
social workers, then they all return to the convent when their work is done.
They think over the events of the day, express their gratitude through prayer
and meditation, and prepare for the next day.
Jebeom believes that this kind of system could be very useful for Buddhists.
For this reason, well-disciplined monastics believe that she is an innovator.
She hopes that the Buddhist community can be restructured. Monastics should
choose one field which they are particularly interested in, rather than
each person studying everything from top to bottom. Monastics who teach
in the temple should strive to improve their teaching methodology. Monastics
who volunteer in society should enter society after studying their area
of specialization thoroughly.
The role of monastics, especially ordained nuns (bhikkhunis), cannot be
overemphasized. There are so many areas female monastics can develop and
work in: spreading Buddhism to children, orphanages, nurseries, kindergartens,
nurses, school teachers, hospices, youth counselling organizations, management,
homes for the elderly, consumer protection agencies, environmental protection
agencies, parenting organizations, and local development councils, and so
forth.
At this point, there may be those who ask, "Then what is the difference
between monastics and ordinary people? If monastics do the work of ordinary
people, what is the distinction between the laity and the Sangha? When will
monastics find time to meditate?" Jebeom Sunim responds, "Monastics
are already involved in religion and are spreading the teachings wearing
the robes. When monastics do farm work, do people in the villages see monastics
only as farmers? If they do farm work with the people in the villages and
understand them and help them live according to Buddhist principles, isn't
that spreading Buddhism?" Jebeom says that the most important thing
is performing the monastic's original task as a monastic. The monastic's
original task and the role of social welfare are not two separate things.
There is a need for social welfare work itself to be considered the task
of a monastic. Jebeom believes that if Korean Buddhism fills this need,
it will become more active, dynamic, and confident. This conviction led
to her work with Active Children and her achievement of excellence and to
surprising results in that work.
A Well-rounded Nursery, the First Managed by Monastics
Jebeom Sunim was deeply moved by her readings in
social science. During the darkness of the 1980s, when people in Korea were
angry, disillusioned, and began questioning the status quo, social and political
upheavals awakened another aspect of her thinking. Especially the tragic
incident of October 27, 1980, when armed soldiers in uniforms and boots
entered the monasteries, including the Buddha halls, to search for anti-government
elements. This shameful incident awakened the historical consciousness of
many monastics.
Jebeom Sunim entered Dongguk University in 1982, around the time of that
incident. She devoured social science books like a hungry child. She read
restricted books every night without sleeping, because she discovered the
tragedy of the lethargic monastic environment. She was exasperated at an
institution that allowed the calamity of October 27. Her concern was not
only because of her youth, but of her integrity that could not ignore such
wrongdoing. She now works as an officer of the National Committee of Actively
Engaged Buddhists and is a leader of social participation.
Jebeom Sunim's active social involvement was a rejection of a Buddhism confined
to the mountains. She felt that the more sedentary Buddhism is, the more
alienated it is from the modern day. This kind of thinking encouraged her
to generate greater energy for her activities.
Toward the end of 1989, Jebeom Sunim lived for a year at Bokyongkung Temple
in Samyangdong, a district of Seoul. The temple grounds are nice and large,
in contrast to the poor, crowded villages of the surrounding neighboring.
She discussed the situation with Doyoeun Sunim, a nun who was staying there
with her. "Let's do something for the village people. It is not reasonable
to use such a large space for just ourselves." Thus, they decided to
create a nursery. The two of them were satisfied with only a small corner
room for their project.
Jebeom Sunim went out to collect funds, while Doyoeun Sunim took care of
maintaining the temple. Jebeom spent ten days visiting various temples in
Seoul. She was able to collect about $4,000 with which to renovate the large
rooms of the temple to create a nursery facility. Then she hung a sign announcing
"Well-rounded Nursery." Within a few days after the announcement,
with two teachers, they had 25 children enrolled. They charged only what
it took to maintain the nursery. Well-rounded Nursery, managed by the nuns,
was welcome news to the poor village where working couples were worried
about the care of their children. When, after only one year, the nursery
was forced to close, the mothers in the village suggested that they manage
the nursery themselves. Well-rounded Nursery, the first nursery in Seoul
to be founded by nuns, is still running in Samyangdong. This is the way
that young Jebeom Sunim lives -- working without hesitation for good causes
and for Buddhism.
Not Stepping Back from Dharma
Working for Buddhism is possible for both Sangha and laypeople if they have
strong faith. Jebeom Sunim gains strength in her life through various practices,
such as koan practice. She chants the name of the bodhisattva Avalokitesvara
while driving a car or sitting at a desk. She checks up constantly to make
sure that her vow to spread Buddhism has not wavered since the time she
initially made it. Active Children is an expression of this vow, working
to actively spread Buddhist culture among children through such means as
children's drama, writing classes, and so on. It aims at providing proper
guidance to Korean children through Buddhist cultural activities.
The power of the vow she has taken has made Jebeom strong and unhesitating.
She succeeded in getting an average of 500 subscribers per month and sold
an additional 800 copies, but refused to give the magazines away for free.
She felt it was correct that people buy the copies -- that people would
read a magazine they had not paid for.
Some subscribers did not have any children. However, they bought copies
of the magazine because of Jebeom's power of persuasion and her advice that
they give the magazine to children they knew. Jebeom was convinced that
Buddhism has no future in Korea unless it is propagated among Korean children.
The Active Children family (editors and staff) admit that the spread of
Buddhism has been greatly furthered through Jebeom's energetic activities.
Suk Jung Park, Assistant Director of the magazine, says, "Jebeom Sunim
has been able to solve big problems that even lay Buddhists could not solve.
We especially felt relieved when she helped substantially to resolve serious
business matters." Jebeom is consulted on important matters, advising
the director of the larger corporation and the chief editor of Active Children.
The chief editor praised her willingness to advise them even on such practical
matters as modernizing packing skills.
Gradually her sense of mission became more and more lucid and consistent.
Initially her Zen master disagreed with her intention to work on the magazine.
She wanted her to become either a university professor or the abbess of
a new temple. But Jebeom's resolution was steadfast. At the time she thought,
"Even though this is something that anybody could do, I will do it."
Nobody could dissuade her from her intention. Now her Zen master and her
temple family are among the biggest supporters of Active Children. Her Zen
master even got 50 subscribers from among the temple's lay members. She
also buys 50 extra copies each month to distribute.
Up to 1994, Jebeom has been giving Buddhist teachings at her Zen master's
temple and other temples in Korea. After that, however, she decided to stop
teaching and devote her entire time and energy to publicity for the magazine.
She said, "The nature of Mahayana is not to step back from the Dharma.
I am not afraid of anything because my whole life is dedicated to the bodhisattva
Avalokitesvara. There is no reason to hesitate. I will continue working
until Active Children can run on its own. I hope this dream will soon come
true. At that time, I plan to return to my studies at the Buddhist institute
and work to fulfill my Zen master's expectations."
Jebeom's determination is very strong. Today she does not hesitate to voice
her opinions to both monks and laypeople throughout the country, affirming
the revitalizing role of Active Children in uplifting Korea's traditional
culture and transmitting it to the next generation.
Editor's note: Translated by Hyosun Kwon and Sun Gak Sunim. Reprinted from
Tae Jung Bulgyo, edited by Hi Kyun Kim.
OPENING
THE HEARTBuddhism aims at the happiness of self and others,
and the two are closely interrelated. It is natural that we desire happiness
for ourselves, but it is more difficult to desire happiness for others.
And one thing which cuts us off from desiring the happiness of others is
fear. We fear that if we are open and vulnerable towards others, we will
get hurt. So we put up barriers and retreat behind them. It is this fear
and anxiety to protect ourselves which prevents our hearts from opening.
What we need to develop is a safe mind -- a mind which is unafraid.
It's not that we don't have love. Love is actually there, but we have to
work at opening our heart. All possible love in the world is actually there
inside our hearts -- it's just covered up. It's like a very deep stream
from a vast underwater source that has been covered up with soil and mud
and stones, and looks dry. We don't have to import water from outside. All
we have to do is clear away the stones and the earth and get to that source.
As we clear away the stones and earth, little dribbles come back. Gradually,
as we clear away more and more, the soil gets moister and moister, and eventually,
it just gushes out, with sheer frenzy, unstoppable. It is the same with
love, which is our true nature. When we clear away the dross from our hearts,
love gushes forth, and there is no room for fear.
Today, I was speaking with a Catholic nun who said that in Christianity
we are always told to love our neighbor, to be compassionate and so on,
but we are not told how to do it. What she especially liked about Buddhism
is that it doesn't just say to love, but has many techniques for learning
how to love. In the beginning these techniques may seem rather artificial
-- still up in the head. But as we become accustomed to these practices
and merge with them, love slowly trickles down from the head and begins
to percolate into the heart.
When we simply sit on our cushion, we become filled with ever so much love,
but when we get up, or somebody interrupts our practice, we may get angry
and think, "Here I am meditating on love. Why are they making so much
noise!" So, we have to check: Is this meditation really producing some
results? If we do it properly, we will really notice a change. Meditation
begins to remove the stones and clear away the heavy earth and mud that
has covered up the wellspring of our genuine loving nature.
So, the first quality we want to develop is loving kindness (maitri). Loving
kindness is the wish that all beings be happy. We begin the practice of
loving kindness by sitting with a calm mind. Then there are various ways
to proceed. In the first method we visualize in front of ourself the person
we love most. Traditionally, this is one's parent, particularly one's mother.
Sakya Trizin, head of the Sakya tradition, once said that it's really difficult
for Westerners to do lesson number one. All sentient beings are like our
kind mother, therefore we must love all sentient beings. But many Westerners
hate their mother! We must come to terms with this. The important thing
is that our parents gave us life We're here because of them. They might
not have intended us, but here we are. When we were small, screaming, and
always hungry, our conversation was not in the least bit fascinating. We
demanded all their attention, they did not get tired of us; they did not
throw us out. They took care of us -- they loved us. Ironically, none of
us consciously remembers the time when we got the most love and attention.
That's the time when everybody found us irresistible. Later on, at the time
we remember, they had changed their opinion! Still, our parents educated
us, took care of us, and fed us. On the whole, except for really abusive
parents, the kindness of the mother is beyond words. Therefore, unless we
have complicated feelings towards our mother or father, they are a good
person to visualize.
We want them to be happy. If we imagine our mother being tortured or in
great pain or sorrow, we would want to release her. So, a parent is considered
a very good object for developing loving kindness. Those who are parents
can try to developing loving kindness toward their child. In this way, we
develop a heart of loving kindness.
The Buddha compared loving kindness to a mother's love for her own child.
Imagine the intensity of a mother's love for her child. We can visualize
anyone we love. Sometimes it's a bit difficult to visualize one's spouse
or partner, because the feelings that person arouses may be a bit complicated.
It may not necessarily be loving kindness which comes to the fore. So, it
may be better to visualize someone a bit more neutral. We're not trying
to arouse desire or attachment; we're trying to arouse lovingkindness. So,
we want to reflect upon a person toward whom we have strong positive feelings.
Then think, "May you be well and happy. May you be peaceful."
In the second method, the first person that we generate loving kindness
towards is ourself. Traditionally, it is said that we cannot give genuine
love if we don't accept ourself. If we are full of self-contempt and self-loathing,
we cannot give genuine love. His Holiness the Dalai Lama once remarked that
one distinction he noticed between Tibetans and Westerners was that most
Tibetans liked themselves -- feel at ease with themselves. But many Westerners
have low self-esteem. Therefore, we sit and think, "May I be peaceful.
May I be at ease. May I be happy." When we talk about having compassion
for all sentient beings, we must remember that we are also sentient beings.
Therefore we are also deserving of love and compassion. So, first we give
love to ourselves. We sit thinking genuine kindness towards ourself, like
a small child -- forgiveness, understanding, and nurturing.
None of us is perfect. If we were perfect, we would all be Buddhas with
radiating auras. We wouldn't need to seek help. Everybody has problems --
this is natural. This is samsara, the realm of birth and death. Why are
we so proud that we imagine we should be perfect when nobody else is? If
we can forgive others, why can't we forgive ourselves? So, first we have
to come to an acceptance of ourselves as we are.
In the West people tend to zoom in on their negative qualities and inflate
them until the negative traits totally overshadow the positive qualities
we have. We end up feeling despondent and hating ourselves. Maybe this comes
from our cultural background -- the idea that we are born in sin and the
guilt that goes with that. In Buddhism our essential nature is perfect.
We all possess Buddha-nature. Our fundamental nature is infinite wisdom,
compassion, purity, and power. We are all like the sun -- it's just that
we're obscured by the clouds. We are all interconnected in having this Buddha
nature. Buddha nature is like the sky -- it doesn't have divisions like
yours, mine, his, or hers.
Meditation on loving kindness is like that -- vast and inconceivable. We
have our faults, of course, but we don't have to identify with them. We
have to recognize them and accept them, but we don't have to cling to them
and get so depressed. Each one of us has very beautiful qualities, too.
It is not wrong to accept the fact that I get upset very quickly, for example,
because on the other hand, I am quite generous. If we don't recognize the
good in ourselves, we cannot develop them. Like a plant, if we put them
in the shade, they will wither and die for lack of acknowledgment. We need
to strike a balance. Otherwise, the spiritual part of us becomes something
very heavy and onerous, instead of being something light and joyful that
naturally replenishes.
So, when we meditate on loving kindness, we feel loving kindness towards
ourself and think, "May I be happy." We feel a sense of peace,
well-being, and happiness in our heart. We feel warmth. Then we think of
someone we love, and from the depths of our heart wish happiness to that
person, too. We can imagine a light going out, transforming the person into
happiness. Then we concentrate on someone whom we feel fairly indifferent
toward and try to arouse a feeling of wanting that person to be happy, too.
How happy we would be if that person were happy!
Then we think of somebody who troubles us in some way, someone disagreeable
that we don't really like, someone who is causing us problems. And we try
to feel exactly the same feeling for that person. May she be happy! May
he be peaceful! We can also watch how we feel while we're doing this. There
may be some resistance, but that's okay. Just recognize it, accept it, and
let it go.
Then gradually we extend that feeling out to include the whole country,
the whole world -- as many different people that come into mind. We include
those who are sick, those we meet on the street, shop assistants, everyone,
and generate a feeling of really wanting them all to be happy. We can divide
space into north, south, east, west, above, and below and wish all beings
within it to be happy. We can think about people in various circumstances,
in certain countries, in certain professions, and send them compassion.
It helps to be specific. We think, "May they be well. May they be peaceful."
Gradually our compassion gets vaster and vaster. Eventually our visualization
is vast enough to include all beings and the heart really opens up wide.
Sometimes people think that Dharma practice is something we do when as we
sit on a meditation cushion. For example, we practice loving kindness meditation
for some time and the rest of the day is a waste of time, filled with worldly
thoughts: "Now I'm doing my spiritual practice and the rest of the
time is just mundane activity." People feel I have no time for practice.
I have even heard lamas say, "I'm so busy, I have no time for practice."
Just consider, for example, the six perfections (paramita): generosity,
ethical conduct, patience, diligence, meditation, and wisdom. Each one is
needed for Buddhahood. Only one of them is meditation. What about the other
five? Generosity means giving, openness -- an open heart and open hands.
Ethical conduct means being ever so careful with one's body and one's speech,
so as not to harm anyone or anything. Patience is the one the Buddha himself
called the greatest -- realizing that the people who cause us the most trouble
are our greatest opportunity to develop this wonderful quality.
We say that family life, social life, and the work place are obstacles to
the practice, but actually they are the practice. When do we think we are
going to practice? All of these are Dharma practices. Sitting on the cushion
is one part, but only a small part. If we use every single encounter as
a practice opportunity, then our whole life is practice. Life is like heavy
dough, so we need some yeast. We don't need much yeast, just a little. Understanding
every situation we meet as an opportunity for practice is like yeast. If
we put it in the dough, voilà! We have this beautiful light dough
that we can bake and make delicious bread.
Every situation, every single person we meet is an object of practice. This
means developing loving kindness toward everyone we meet. This definitely
means our intimate family, too. Sometimes loving kindness is expressed least
in the family circle. Notice the way partners speak with each other. Since
I left India, I have spent quite a lot of time living with various couples,
most of whom I consider well-adjusted. But behind closed doors, they sometimes
say things we wouldn't dream of saying to even our worst enemy. And this
to the person we are supposed to love.
When we sit and think, "May all sentient beings be happy. May all sentient
beings be at their ease," it's very easy to think of all the sentient
beings -- all the little sb's -- as being out there somewhere on the horizon.
We get up feeling full of love. But who are these sentient beings we are
talking about? They are, first of all, the people closest to us: our family,
our partner, our children, our friends, people in our work place, people
who annoy us. People who annoy us are wonderful objects of practice. It
is very easy to be loving to those who are kind to us. This is a problem
for me. People are usually extremely kind to me -- far more than I deserve
-- so I get very little opportunity to practice patience. But in India that
will change and I look forward to it.
People who annoy us are really objects for developing lots and lots of loving
kindness and patience. It is not enough to be loving to those who love us.
The Tibetans say that if there are two people -- one stroking us, speaking
sweet words, and another cursing us, cutting us with a knife -- we should
feel equal love toward both.
In our everyday life, we have infinite opportunities to practice. We should
remember that every person we meet is to themself most dear, whether it
is the president or a road sweeper. All of them think they are the center
of the universe. When we see a group photo, who is the first person we look
for? No one wants others to revile us, be mean to us, or be rude to us.
Everyone wants others to be kind, polite, and helpful to us. If we want
that, why should we not give it to others? Every single person that comes
before us is the most precious being at that moment. At that moment, they
are the most important person in the world to us, because they are the reality
of the moment. Everyone else is just a thought in our mind. If we remember
that and think of that this person is like us -- vulnerable, wanting only
to be happy, afraid of being hurt -- then from our hearts, we can say, "May
you be well!" And when we smile, we will smile with our eyes, from
our heart.
Many people have met His Holiness the Dalai Lama, or at least seen him on
film. Of course, His Holiness has infinite qualities, but one special quality
is that he is completely with the person who is right in front of him. He
looks the person straight in the eye and there is a feeling of total love
and acceptance. Whether it is the pope, president, a renowned author, journalist,
politician, church dignitary, or whomsoever -- he treats them all the same.
And it's like pulling a carpet from under their feet, because they're not
used to being treated as just another person. He is so genuine himself that
he forces other people to be genuine.
We also need to develop compassion (karuna). Compassion is the wish that
beings be free from suffering. Loving kindness is the wish that beings be
happy and compassion is the wish that they be free from suffering. Compassion
literally means to "feel with." So compassion means feeling empathy
with beings who are suffering and wishing to relieve them of their sufferings.
In Mahayana, compassion is especially emphasized. Wisdom and compassion
together constitute the intrinsic nature of a Buddha.
Sometimes people are afraid to open up their hearts to the sufferings of
others, feeling they will be completely overwhelmed and unable to cope.
If one has this fear, it is good to reflect on the beings we have met who
embody great compassion. Again, we can think of someone like His Holiness
the Dalai Lama, because he is the embodiment of the bodhisattva of compassion.
He genuinely exemplifies great compassion. He had to leave his country and
his people are so oppressed. Everywhere he looks, there are problems --
the troubles of his people in Tibet, his people in India and Nepal, and
then the whole world situation. He goes around the world to various conferences
and gatherings, and wherever he goes, again and again, there is suffering,
suffering, suffering....He has such a tender heart and he weeps. But, along
with his tender, open, infinitely loving compassionate heart, he has twinkling
eyes and a big belly laugh. When you meet him, he's so full of joy and optimism!
That optimism and joy in no way detract from his vast compassion. We need
to rethink our concept of what compassion really means.
If we allow ourselves to become overwhelmed with the enormity of the sufferings
in the world, then we just become heavy, gloomy, and unable to effect any
kind of transformation. When people come to us with their sufferings and
we feel miserable, they may end up feeling worse than before. It doesn't
help. There needs to be a balance between genuinely acknowledging and caring
for the sufferings of others and being able to transform those sufferings
into something workable that can be used to gradually surmount the suffering.
In the Tibetan tradition, compassion is an enormously important quality.
There is a practice called tong len, "giving and taking." In this
meditation, we visualize sending out light. We eject all the darkness from
ourself, getting rid of all the gloom and suffering, and evoke, or bring
all light, joy, and goodness into ourself. We visualize someone in deep
suffering, whether a very terrible sickness or great sorrow. With the in-breath,
we breathe into ourselves all the person's heaviness, sadness, sickness,
and grief, in the form of a dark light. We absorb this all into ourself
and send out all our own vast reservoirs of goodness, joy, light, and peace
to that person.
Sometimes people doing this visualization get overwhelmed. This is not the
objective -- the objective is to open up the heart. There are two ways of
dealing with this feeling of being overwhelmed. One way is to consider,
"Why am I afraid of being hurt?" We sense a tight little knot
inside us -- this "me" that we cherish so strongly, and are always
protecting, so fearful of being harmed. Then we visualize all the sufferings
of others coming into ourselves, absorbing into this dark sense of "I,"
and dissolving into emptiness. The dark, tight sense of "me" dissolves
into spaciousness and emptiness. And from that emptiness comes light. Another
way is to visualize Buddha-nature as a little crystal -- very bright and
shiny. Buddha mind is vast, indestructible, and brilliant. We visualize
all sufferings absorbing into that. Like water hitting a very hot pan, the
moment they hit our genuine Buddha-nature, all that suffering transforms
into light.
The quality of wishing to exchange oneself for others is so beautiful. When
I was about nine years old, I caught on fire. I was wearing a nylon dress
and when it touched against an electric fire, I was blazing. Fortunately
for me, my mother, who usually worked in a shop, was home with kidney trouble.
It was very painful, so she was upstairs in bed. I went rushing up the stairs
into the bedroom where she was lying. She immediately wrapped me up in a
clean sheet and a blanket. She said that my whole back was burned -- it
was one big blister. As I was lying on the bed, I left the body and had
a kind of out-of-body experience. I was looking down at my body lying all
burnt up. It was extremely painful for a moment and then I lost consciousness.
There were beings of light, saying: "Come with us." And I thought,
"Oh, great. I'm going to die. That would be interesting. Let's see
how it is." I absolutely did not want to go back into this burned body.
I wanted to go with the beings of light.
The next thing I knew, I was back in the body and the neighbors were coming
in, taking me to the hospital. I remember lying on the stretcher and one
of the doctors saying, "You're a very brave little girl, because you
must be in tremendous pain." But when I got back in my body, I could
notice no pain. When I later asked my mother about this, she told me she
thought I was going to die. As I was lying there unconscious, she prayed,
"Please, don't let her die. Don't let her suffer. She is too young
to suffer. Give all her pain to me."
We need to be aware that everyone we meet wants only happiness and does
not want suffering, just like ourself. And we think, "May I help that
being be happy. May I help that being be free from suffering." Kindness
is very simple. We tend to think that the spiritual path is something very
high, vast, and unattainable. But it is really so simple. All we need to
do is be kind in every word and deed.
I waited for Sdenka till 6:45, then left the house
for the temple. She had said that she wanted to go but not to wait if she
was running late, which was often with her job and the traffic. So, I set
out for the Zen Academy on Bunkerhill. It was a hidden building, but I had
noticed it coming home from school one evening about two weeks ago. And
it was near the house, so getting there in this overgrown city wouldn't
be such a hassle. Among my least favorite things to do is driving, especially
driving in a busy city.
Sunset was nearing when I pulled into the parking lot of the Zen Academy.
No other cars were there. It was seven o'clock straight up, so I thought
for a moment the Monday evening meeting was canceled. But as I pulled around
behind the building, I saw a parked car and a man peering over the top at
me. I turned my car around and parked under the tin carport that fenced
in the property behind the building.
Out of my car I could see it was a big building. It stood tall in an odd
place, backed up to a street of single-storey houses on one side and concealed
on the other side by an old gas station that was crowded with several rusty
cars propped up on cinder blocks. Part of the three-storey structure extended
over a parking area under which was the only other car and the man. I approached
and asked where I might find Craig Learned. He looked around comically,
like Chaplin, then said that's me.
Dressed in sweat pants, slippers and a T-shirt that read Boston with a downtown
skyline, he stood next to a riding lawnmower with a rag in one hand and
a can of starter fluid in the other. I introduced myself and he asked how
I came to know his name and if I knew anything about lawnmower engines.
I said I knew Anne Klein, and it so happened Pat Cox too, and that I hadn't
messed with one of these in a long time. I squatted down next to the engine
and began to examine the carburetor.
"Anne Klein, at Rice, right?" "Yeah, I'm taking her intro
to Buddhism course," I said. He sprayed some starter fluid into the
carb and began pulling on the starter rope. The engine fired up for about
two seconds then quit. "Is there a service tonight," I asked.
"Oh yeah. I'm here two or three nights a week and sometimes in the
morning," Craig said. I reached over and moved the throttle linkage
back and forth a few times. He sprayed some more starter fluid into the
carb and heaved on the rope. Again the engine fired up for about two or
three seconds. "I understand she is not only a professor but a practitioner
of meditation as well." "That's right," I said. "Pat
Cox?" Craig asked. "Yeah," I said. "He also gave me
your name. I teach at H.C.C. and I'm a grad student at Rice. It seems like
it's starved for fuel." "Yeah, I think so," Craig said. I
told him that I came here to learn something about Zen Buddhism and he began
telling me the story of Kashyapa who, when the Buddha twirled a flower one
day, smiled, thus signaling his enlightenment to the Buddha. He pulled the
starter rope and the engine turned over but didn't fire. I pointed to a
second linkage and said I thought this might be the choke, then pulled it.
Craig sprayed more fluid into the carb then pulled on the rope. The engine
fired for about three seconds then quit.
"Pat Cox. Of course. He's a really nice guy." "Yeah, he's
great," I said. "And you work with Pat at the community college?"
Craig asked. "Yeah, I teach English at Central campus. Why don't you
put the throttle there in the full open position. I think that might open
the choke." Craig pushed the throttle lever all the way down and the
choke linkage slid over with the throttle linkage. "That's it,"
I said. "Now give it a try." He sprayed some more fluid into the
carb and pulled on the rope. The engine fired for about three seconds then
quit.
Craig told me that one of the things you have to know about Zen is that
it's really an attitude of unlearning and not hard and fast learning. It's
like you begin every task in your life as if it were the first time. He
said it's a back and forth movement of unlearning and learning. All the
time. Every day. We could see fuel inside the translucent fuel filter so
I asked him if he had a pair of pliers. Maybe, I thought, if we could pull
this clamp, we could see if the fuel was getting through the filter and
into the carburetor. Together we walked over to his car and he opened the
trunk. While digging through two old metal tool boxes he told me that Zen
is about attention.
"Concentration is key to Zen," he said. "I've got pliers
coming out my ears at home, but wouldn't you know it, no pliers." We
moved back over to the lawnmower. Craig sprayed some more fluid into the
carburetor and while I pulled on the choke linkage he tugged the starter
rope. Like before, the engine revved up high for two or three seconds then
died.
He capped the carburetor with the air-filter and we pushed the lawnmower
into the building. We pushed off our shoes then washed our oily hands clean
in the downstairs bathrooms, me in the men's room, him in the ladies' room.
We then went upstairs to the third floor. By this time it was beginning
to get dark so as we walked through the halls he would snap on light switch
after light switch.
Upstairs, the Academy was a collection of different size rooms, mostly unfurnished
but with pillows of various sizes neatly lined up on the floor. We were
the only ones in the building and the empty rooms seemed to exaggerate our
isolation. We entered the largest room which had a nicely finished wooden
tier on one wall with several gold statues on top. The center statue was
the Buddha seated cross-legged and flanked by what looked like two female
figures. The gold statues gleamed well against the oakwood tier and the
white walls.
"It's customary to make a half bow to the Buddha as we enter this room."
Observing Craig, I put my hands together and bowed.
On the lower level of the tier were several clay pots filled with sand.
Craig picked up two sticks of incense, lighted them and stood them in one
of the pots. I wondered to myself if each stick of incense was for each
person in attendance. He said that normally we would begin by reciting some
of the Heart Sutra but our attempt at lawnmower repair had fulfilled that
obligation.
He showed me the memorial wall, a small section of wall in one corner neatly
covered with small blocks of cedar. There were gaps in the arrangement.
There might be ten blocks on the top row, four on the next, twelve on the
next, two on the next, and so on. But the randomness had a discernible order
to it as well. It looked as though an artist had rendered into wood an old
computer punch card. Craig explained to me that this feature of the temple
wasn't necessarily Buddhist by nature, but was a great source of revenue
for the temple. I breathed in the warm smell of cedar and thought of the
coat closet in my parents' house and how I used to hide in it on Saturday
mornings when my father called me to do yard work.
We moved into an adjoining room, a smaller room with no furniture but a
small stand for an incense burner. On the floor were eight large rectangular
pillows, each with a smaller round pillow on top and lined up in two rows.
Craig took a wooden stick that was hanging on the wall and we both sat down.
He demonstrated the different seating positions and explained to me two
types of common meditation practice in Zen. The first method is to count
your inhalations and exhalations. Just steadily count them, and try to keep
your attention on your breathing. The second method is to be keenly aware
of the sounds around you. If you hear a bird, then you simply hear the bird.
If you hear a dog bark, then you simply hear the dog bark. You take all
this in but you remain still and concentrated. This second practice is very
difficult though, he said. I wasn't too clear on the second technique, but
I didn't want to ask too many questions. I simply wanted to be there and
observe.
Craig told me that three claps with the stick signaled the beginning of
a sitting, one clap signaled the end of a session, and three more claps
signaled the end of that sitting. He asked me if I practice any meditation.
I told him I used to practice some years before. I had been initiated into
a spiritual community in Northern India which was similar to Hinduism and
Sikhism, but was very non-violent. I demonstrated the position, squatting
with both feet flat on the floor. The elbows are placed on the knees, the
fingers cover the eyes, the left thumb goes into the left ear and the right
thumb pushes the right ear closed. "What do you concentrate on?"
he asked. "When you're initiated into it, they tell you five words
which you should never write down or tell to anyone. In meditation, you
repeat these words in a whisper over and over." "Then don't tell
them to me if you took a vow of silence."
Craig pulled his legs together and showed me how to position my hands together
with the thumb tips touching. He said we would sit for twenty-five minutes.
Sit up straight, not bent over but not ram-rom straight either, he told
me. Now take in a few deep breaths. I inhaled deeply and heard the three
claps of the stick against his hand. In my studies I am a very unfocused
person. I'm a slow reader who must read everything two or three times just
to get the surface meaning. I have eyes that drop in and out of focus constantly
-- a problem that still baffles many eye doctors -- and I am plagued with
constant headaches which nag at my attention span. Most everywhere I go
I carry three pairs of glasses, switching them depending on the mood of
my eyes,
and in my pocket I have an old metal pillbox filled with asperin.
Perhaps my search for meaning is an attempt to find a way past my handicaps.
But I think I am moved by something more. I have tried to renounce meaning
and say there's nothing more to life than death. That nothing lies beyond
death and life is absent of any real meaning.
But something enigmatic pounds in my head. My good friend Father Mandry
called it grace. He told me it was a blessing. But in the world where I
live, in my environment, my circumstances, I'm not sure I'd call it a blessing.
Whatever it is that urges me on my search, making absurd the working world,
the money-making world, the practical world, making my head hurt, I call
a curse. I believe G-d has cursed me with his presence. I feel like some
social aberration who can't let go.
I sat for twenty-five minutes, counting my breath, listening to a dog bark
and the birds sing while the sun went down, doing battle with the silence
in my head, trying to control my concentration. I saw the face of my old
master who died the day my plane from overseas touched down in the U.S.
Meditation is a craft, like barrel making or book binding or cobbling. It
first takes patience. One has to refine the skill over a long period of
time. But most importantly, one must have a teacher.
Craig clapped the stick in his hand three times and we quietly stretched
our legs. Much less talkative than before, we walked down the hallway, he
snapping out the lights as we passed each room. Outside, he told me of the
Friday night meetings, and hoped that I would return to sit and to study.
Driving home I thought, where else but in a sincerely spiritual setting
can two strangers come together out of the evening dusk and sit shoeless
side by side in silence without once thinking this is an absurd situation.
It was the longest twenty-five minutes of my life.
All the major developments in human history have been spearheaded by men ... above all the greatest spiritual achievements have all been made by men. [page 44]
How marvellous! How know-it-all to arrive at such
a sweeping judgement. Particularly seeing that most 'spiritual achievements',
whatever they may be, great or small, go entirely unrecorded. This is the
kind of book which makes me want to cry out in dismay at its arrogance.
I long ago reached the conclusion that although Buddhism is usually talked
about as though it were a single entity, this is not the case. There are
a large number of differing Buddhisms, a plurality. When people ask me,
as they do, what Buddhism has to say about this, that or the other, I am
inclined to give a response that starts with the statement that there are
at least fifty-seven varieties of organised Buddhism -- each of which might
well give a differently slanted answer from its own particular viewpoint.
Of course, we are told, Sakyamuni said all views have to be given up eventually,
right views as much as wrong views. However, a great deal of clinging to
a multiplicity of views seems to go on in many Buddhist organisations. These
organisations are inclined to be just as hierarchic, bureaucratic and power-structured
as any secular institution. All power tends to corrupt, absolute power absolutely!
Let aspiring Buddhists beware. Let all aspirants to awakening be aware.
All this by way of a preamble to a review of Men, Women and Angels, an exposition
by Subhuti of Sangharakshita's views on women and men in the spiritual life.
I am as reluctant to review this book as Subhuti was to write it. He says,
"There are many matters in which I am much more interested." On
that point we agree -- but not on much else.
The book attempts to set out and justify Sangharakshita's evolutionary theory
of spiritual development. This is hierarchic in structure. Subhuti writes:
"Sangharakshita has expressed this hierarchy in more contemporary
and Western terms: animal, woman, man, artist, angel -- the aphorism that
heads this article refers to the same ordering: 'Angels are to men as men
are to women -- because they are more human and, therefore, more divine.'"
[page 28]
Subhuti has much to say about women, almost as much as men, but next to
nothing about artists or angels. In the case of the latter, G.K. Chesterton's
remark is apt: "Angels fly because they take themselves lightly."
Perhaps the angels saw Subhuti coming and all flew away. Women, however,
are treated very heavily, pinned to the ground one might say. No playfulness
or light-filled humour is to be found here. It's all very disputatious and
weighty.
To give you the full thrust of Subhuti's arguments I have to quote extensively. For those of us who are Sangharakshita's disciples, the position is clear. He does say that women generally have less spiritual aptitude than men ... [page 58] |
| Actually it is quite possible to recognise relative inferiority in another whilst retaining a very positive and sympathetic attitude to them. [13] |
| [Sangharakshita] views the 'natural' relationship between the sexes as fundamentally one of tension -- and he does not consider men, by any means, to have always had the upper hand in that struggle. The 'fortunes of war' have gone now one way and now another ... Men have of course sometimes oppressed women (and women, men), just as Jews have sometimes enslaved Gentiles (and Gentiles, Jews!). [11] |
| [T]raditional subordination of women to men should not be seen in terms of political oppression, since it is an arrangement that largely suits both parties and reveals the real state of affairs in the traditional relationship between the sexes ... The leadership ... naturally falls to the member of the sex ... whose greater detachment from the immediacy of subjective impulse fits him better for the ordering and planning of its arrangements and future. [86] |
| Sangharakshita points out ... the woman's form, her 'psycho-physical complex', already gives greater expression to interests and concerns that have little affinity with spiritual life. Her consciousness is therefore, from the outset, likely to be more limited ... [30] |
| Human reproduction ties women closely to the rhythms of their bodies and motherhood demands the capacity for visceral empathy. The female character that arises from these facts limits many women, whether they are mothers or not ... They are thus characteristically far more anchored to the lower evolution ... [42] |
| Regardless of the obvious disadvantages, many women with some spiritual aspiration ... still feel that strong urge to give birth. [41] |
| These biological imperatives play a major part in forming the basic characters of most women ... marked by a practical conservatism ... providing a background of stability and care for growing children ... However, they are not characteristics that, by and large, support spiritual commitment. ...In a way giving birth to and nurturing a child is an achievement -- although it is a largely passive achievement that demands no qualities of individual striving. ...From a spiritual point of view, that whole world of interest ... is quite simply a distraction from the fundamental issues of life -- and a distraction men can never feel in the same way. [40] |
| Despite the urgency and persistence of the sexual desire, [man's] interest in sex is immediate, short term, and relatively uncomplicated, often with little personal interest attached. If they could have sex at will without any further commitment, many men would be largely content to do so. This relative freedom ... leaves men with energy and interest to spare for other things ... cultural and spiritual effort. [43] |
| The aggressive drive and initiative required to inseminate a woman ... are precisely the qualities needed to break through from the known to the unknown. The passive, enduring, and nurturing qualities of a woman are precisely opposed to that breakthrough. [44] |
| The insistent tug of the body and its concerns does not drag men back into the lower evolution, so they are freer to rise on the Higher Evolution. [47] |
| One interesting question ... is the extent to which those women who do show great aptitude for spiritual life display masculine characteristics... [23] |
| For obvious psychological reasons, it is generally more difficult for men to find a healthy cultural or spiritual model in a woman than it is for women to find one in a man ... This should at least be one of the factors reviewed by those whose job it is to select people to lead classes ... [78] |
The strongly held views about women and men grasped by Sangharakshita (and also by Subhuti) may be summarised as follows:
These views are based upon a thesis labelled "the
hierarchy of being" for which no proof is offered, rather a welter
of explanations in terms of physiology, biology, psychology, social role
theory, spiritual traditions etc. We are told that "Buddhists celebrate
spiritual hierarchy as central to their understanding of life." Dear
reader, let me level with you: not this particular Buddhist. As far as I
am concerned with are all members one of another in Buddha nature. I am
a non-entity, that is all.
Subhuti believes that the true liberation of women lies in their accepting
the views about themselves promulgated, in his wisdom, by Sangharakshita.
As a result, once these views are accepted women's "path to supreme
Enlightenment lies clear and open." Then, as the last sentence in the
book states, "All that is needed is some manly effort" (our italics).
Arrogant to the last, one might comment.
I am glad this book has been published. At least now members of the Friends
of the Western Buddhist Order and others will be able to ascertain what
Sangharakshita's views concerning the differing spiritual aptitudes of men
and women and their consequences actually are. I trust that full and frank
dialogue will ensue. Perhaps a reading of the Kalama Sutta should take place
prior to all dialogues.
Women, Men & Angels by Subhuti (Alex Kennedy). Windhorse Publications,
Birmingham, 1995. 97 pages (paperback), net £4.99, ISBN 0 904766 75
6.
Editor's note: This article first appeared in the Winter 96-7 issue
of Interbeing, the UK Journal of Engaged Buddhism. To subscribe for one
year (3 issues), please send £6 UK, £8 Europe/World surface,
£10 World Air, sterling cheques made out to: Leeds Network of Engaged
Buddhists, 91 Clarendon Road Leeds LS2 9LY, telephone 0113-2444 289 or email
INTERBEING@compuserve.com.
German Sakyadhita members met in Hamburg at Semkye
Ling, a new Tibetan centre, in October 1996. In addition to members, Nell
Willekens, Sakyadhita representative from the Netherlands, also attended.
The meeting discussed Sakyadhita's history and the character of the biannual
conferences characterised by interreligious and intercultural exchange,
including the need to adapt religious traditions to modern times. Each international
conference has highlighted conditions for local (Sri Lankan, Thai and Ladakhi)
women and has inspired improvements.
Rotraut Wurst, the German representative, has been active in public relations
work, swapping newsletters with other Buddhist organizations and other women's
organizations in Germany.
Sakyadhita is not only a nuns' support group. It addresses themes of interest
to all Buddhist women in modern society. For example, at the last Sakyadhita
Conference, Chatsumarn Kabilsingh spoke about Buddhism and prostitution.
A related workshop discussed Buddhism and women's health.
Sakyadhita Germany discussed the possibility of registering itself as a
tax-deductible organization in Germany, with its own agenda and legal status.
This would make publicity easier. Everyone present agreed to establish such
an organization and to expand the circular letters to a newsletter. They
decided that an additional membership fee for Sakyadhita Germany would be
fixed at the next meeting. The Dutch representative was recruited as the
foreign correspondent for the newsletter, with a view to bringing out a
newsletter for Sakyadhita Europe in the next few years.
-- Based on a report by Jasmin Bassett, President, Sakyadhita-UK
In 1979 four women arrived simultaneously at the
newly established Chithurst Monastery (Cittaviveka) in West Sussex, England
to live and practise Dhamma with the developing monastic community of monks
there. Two years earlier, the Venerable Ajahn Chah had sent four of his
Western disciples, headed by Ajahn Sumedho, to live in England and before
long there was much interest and a growing number of people wishing to undertake
the monastic training and lifestyle.
Wishing to undertake the nuns' training, those first four women lived within
the eight-precept discipline, modelled on the white-robed maechee of the
Thai Theravadan tradition. But before long, it became obvious that a more
detailed and comprehensive training was required to help the women's community
live together and grow spiritually.
Within the Theravadan tradition there is presently no Bhikkhuni ordination
available to women -- but the ten-precept form of the samaneri was possible,
so from that, with the help of a designated senior monk, a way of training
appropriate for Western women began to take shape. Eventually, the new training
code would draw from both the Bhikkhu and Bhikkhuni Vinayas, and has resulted
in what we have called the Siladhara Vinaya training -- a body of some 120
rules and monastic observances based on the ten precepts.
As alms-mendicant nuns we are supported in the traditional way and so are
able to train in respect of the four requisites. We observe the traditional
Vassa (rains retreat) season and fortnightly Uposathas, reciting our training
rules regularly (when there is a sangha of at least four nuns living together).
In our particular tradition, the Vinaya training is afforded great significance.
It forms an essential counterpart to the practice and understanding of Dhamma.
It serves to create a kind of boundary which can mirror kilesa (mental defilements),
creating the opportunity for relinquishing or transforming such afflictive
mind-states. Without such a boundary or container, the force of habit will
tend to hold sway. In the Pali scriptures, the Buddha, just before his parinibbana,
emphasised to Ananda, his long-term attendant:
Ananda, it may be that you will think: "The Teacher's instruction has ceased, now we have no teacher!" It should not be seen like this, Ananda, for what I have taught and explained to you as Dhamma and Discipline will, at my passing, be your teacher." (Digha-Nikaya 16)
It was in 1984 that Amaravati Monastery was established
in Hertfordshire with the intention of functioning more as a Dhamma centre,
accommodating the growth of interest in both the monastic and lay Buddhist
lifestyles. As well as providing a training centre for the growing nuns'
community, it provided more facilities for guest accommodation, a retreat
centre and a large library.
The Nuns' Order has been established for 14 years now, and as can be expected
of any new venture of such import, it has been through its ups and downs
as we learn through experience (as opposed to ideals) just what actually
works, what is supportive, and what is not. This rocky process of birth
and coming to maturity is a natural one it seems, and one of essential learning
experience too. Many women have come and gone over the years, testing the
waters for various periods of time and adding their own unique ingredients
to the developing form. We are still a relatively small community, with
thirteen siladhara and eight anagarikas, and perhaps the rocky waters are not entirely passed,
but the base now feels quite strong -- with a growing sense of stability,
maturity and ever-deepening commitment.
It is largely through the benefit of the Vinaya training that a forward-moving
growth can take place. When a guiding principle is agreed upon and honoured
by the group, then there is the possibility of growing beyond the limitations
of individuals' whims and ways, beyond the restrictive and constrictive
structures of self-view, to the liberating freedom from "me" and
"mine".
The development of our community is now entering a new phase. Since the
beginning, the nuns have lived and trained in the double communities of
Amaravati and Cittaviveka, sharing the burden of the various duties and
teaching responsibilities both inside and outside of the monasteries. Over
the years, the monks and nuns have learnt a great deal from each other,
gradually developing skilful means of fostering and supporting a mutual
respect and spiritual friendship within the brahmacariya life.
Now we have the opportunity to reside for the next two years in one of our
branch monasteries in south England and experiment with a small nuns' community
living alone there, while still maintaining a Nuns' Sangha at both Cittaviveka
and Amaravati. This may spread the community a little thinly for a while,
but it seems that a worthwhile commitment to make. It brings into focus
aspects of our training that will now need further clarification and definition
and as an experience will certainly create some new dynamics to work with
as well. But the timing of such a move seems right.
To be able to cultivate the Path of the Buddha in such times and places
and with supportive conditions seems extremely fortunate. The way forward
is not always easy to discern, but if we continue to allow the guiding principles
of Dhamma-Vinaya to effect the transformation of our hearts and inform our
actions, then we can trust in the unfolding of the process, with the Triple
Refuge as both an inner and outer support.
i Anagarikas are eight-precept
nuns who commit themselves for at least two years before deciding on higher
ordination.
Sakyadhita-Singapore, along with the National Kidney Foundation, held the openingsceremony of a new Dialysis- and Daycare Center for the Elderly on March 29, 1997. This was attended by thousands of supporters and well-wishers. It is the first dialysis center co-sponsored by a Buddhist organization. Sakyadhita is the first Buddhist Women women'a group to be officially registered in Singapore.
Preparations are under way to establish a World
Wide Web presence for Sakyadhita International! Bhikkhuni Karma Lekshe Tsomo
is planning to put together a Sakyadhita webpage of resources on women and
Buddhism, and has already acquired an URL (web address) for the new page.
She is being assisted by Julia Milton, a Sakyadhita-UK member who last summer
created Women Active in Buddhism, the Web's first page dedicated to women
and Buddhism.
If all goes well, the page should appear on http://www2.hawaii.edu/~tsomo/ within the next few months. Ideally the page would include,
for example:
In the meantime, if you have Web access you are
also welcome to take a look at:
the Sakyadhita Los Angeles webpage, http://www.cpsc.suu.edu/users/henderso/sakya.htm
the Women Active in Buddhism webpage, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/miltonj/women.htm
(it includes a regularly updated page on the upcoming Sakyadhita conference
in Cambodia, http://www.lancs.ac.uk/staff/miltonj/women.htm ). Please be
prompt, though; Julia will be moving to Canada later in the spring and the
page won't be there for much longer!
If you have experience with writing webpages and would like to help, we
would love to hear from you! Please contact Lekshe c/oSakyadhita, 400 Hobron
Lane #2615, Honolulu HI 96815, USA.